Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Doing the Obvious

One of the things that you hear a lot in the education field is that, “we should do whatever it takes to help our children succeed.” I don’t mean to be pessimistic, but if that person is not directly in education, they probably don’t mean it. What they probably mean is, “someone else should do whatever it takes to help children succeed as long as it doesn’t inconvenience me.”

Case in point: Where I teach, school starts at 7:40 in the morning. I’ve read more than one study (and I recently read a book that further emphasized this) stating that teenagers are almost completely incapable of being fully functional at this time of day. They just aren’t built for it. Teenagers are almost all natural night owls and forcing them to be up and “alert” so early has a number of negative effects. Not the least of which is poor performance in school.

It would a simple and obvious change to move the school day later. It would help our students. It will never happen. At least, not for a long time because parents would have to rearrange schedules. Sports schedules would be interfered with because of later start times/darkness. None of these things has anything to do with learning. If we were merely concerned with learning, we would make this change right away, but we don’t because it inconveniences too many people.

Another example is time spent in the classroom. In the US, we are pushing kids to spend more and more time in the classroom, but in the most successful educational cultures, the school day is often shorter and some of it is taken up by recess and music and art. All things America is actively cutting from curriculum.

So much of education right now is supposedly driven by data, and so it seems paradoxical that so much good research about education is being completely ignored because it’s inconvenient or it contradicts our preconceived notions about how education should work (more is better!). An unwillingness to make obvious, if difficult changes is a big part of what makes me constantly doubt supposed reformers who are so insistent that “we” need to do something.

Summer Goals

It’s not summer vacation yet, but I can feel it coming. This year has been rewarding, but also tiring, and I would be lying if I didn’t say I was looking forward to exploring some of my personal interests for the first time in a while. To that end, here are m goals for the summer:

1. Write 60,000 words of fiction. That, I know, is a ton. it’s about 1,000 words a day, but I think it’s doable. the summer before I started teaching I wrote roughly that much and this is the first summer where I feel I’ll really have the time to work like that again. I have at least three new projects in mind and another I want to finish up, so if I run into problems on one, I should be able to switch gears fairly easily. I also think it will help me to have a daily word goal instead of the monthly page goals I’ve done before.

2. Read at least 20 books. This would be a pretty normal summer for me. Mostly, I just want to make sure I don’t forget about reading in the midst of writing.

3. Learn to play “Beeswing” and maybe “1952 Vincent Black Lightning.” It has been several years since I engaged in serious guitar playing, but lately, I’ve started to get back on the horse (buying a beautiful new guitar certainly helped). These two Richard Thompson songs will definitely push me, but it would be really cool to be able to play them.

4. Have a life. National Boards kind of killed my life this year. I want to go out with my wife, go to the zoo with kids, have lunch with friends. You know, normal people things.

I’ll start work in earnest on these in a few weeks. I think I can do all of these. We’ll see, though.

The Code of Knowledge

I’ve been thinking a lot about the nature of knowledge lately and a conversation I had yesterday really brought home one of my favorite parts about what it means to know things.

At our local farmers market, there is always someone playing acoustic music. When we walked up this week, we saw the performer’s back and I noticed that his guitar looked special. It looked like a Lowden, something I’d never seen up close (only at Richard Thompson concerts), but had looked at online. He had a tuner on the headstock, obscuring the logo, so I couldn’t be sure. We went about our shopping. As we were getting ready to leave and were walking back past him just as he finished a song. I asked what kind of guitar it was.

“It’s a Lowden,” he said. I said I’d thought it was a Lowden, but I’d never seen one up close. And right there, we had each signified to the other that we were members of the same tribe. He told me he was going to take a break in about five minutes and that I could play it if I wanted. I accepted (just to be clear, this is a fabulously well made and VERY expensive guitar. It’s the kind of thing you hand down to your children).

When I came back a few minutes later to play, he handed it to me and I began to finger pick a little. Hearing, I suppose, that I could play somewhat tunefully, he offered me a pick while noting that there was no pick guard (but assuring me that I didn’t look like someone who banged on guitars. Again, more code. He is effectively saying to me, “You can play, and I see that. I’m pretty sure about you, but not entirely sure. Use this, but please don’t damage my very nice instrument.”

After I played for a minute (I took a little solo while the guy who was spelling him strummed), we talked about the nature of the guitar. the neck shape. The sound. I mentioned Richard Thompson playing one (this is more code – guitarists are supposed to know about Richard Thompson). In the end, he invited me to stop by a song circle that has been going on for years and to which all stringed instruments are welcome (except banjo’s, “we don’t want it to turn into a country thing”).

The whole exchange was maybe ten minutes and would be all but meaningless to most people, but for the two of us, it was really cool, and it would not have been possible if we weren’t both intimately familiar with guitars. We both had specialized knowledge that we had spent years trying to obtain. It’s amazing how far that can go toward starting a friendship.

Music Grand Slams

I used to write about music here sometimes. I haven’t done that in a long time. But I feel like doing it again and it’s my blog so I’m going to do what I want, just for today.

Recently, Sound Opinions (my favorite podcast) did an episode on musical grand slams. The premise was that a band/artist had to put out four great albums in a row. This sounds like fun, I think, and so I’m going to do it. My choices will probably be more obvious than theirs. Whatever, these are the five I could come up with.

1. Bruce Springsteen (Greetings from Asbury Park; The Wild, the Innocent, and the E Street Shuffle; Born to Run, Darkness on the Edge of Town) – Many people think Springsteen was flawless until after Born in the USA, but I don’t like either that album or The River as much as some others do (Nebraska is a masterpiece, though). But those first four albums, many that’s a way to start a career. I especially love to imagine seeing that band during the first two albums when they were still, basically, a bar band. What would it have been like to walk in on that kind of frenetic energy?

2. The Derek Trucks Band (Soul Serenade, Joyful Noise, Songlines, Already Free) – For a band that I really think is at its best live, The Derek Trucks Band was consistently great in the studio. Indeed, if I wanted, I could add in live albums or extend this list to include the recent Tedeschi Trucks album. Derek Trucks is, I think, musically invincible. He knows so much about music and incorporates so many influences into his music that it just never gets boring.

3. Teddy Thompson (Teddy Thompson, Separate Ways, Up Front and Down Low, A Piece of What You Need) – Though his dad doesn’t make the list (lots of runs of three great albums, none of four), Thompson the younger has started his career with a bang. No one knows who Teddy Thompson is, but he’s one of our favorites in the Linden household. The one time I’ve been able to see him live, he was the opener and just blew the headliner off the stage. He’s a fantastic songwriter and boy, what a voice.

4. Buddy Guy (Heavy Love, Sweet Tea, Blues Singer, Bring ‘Em In) – It took a long time for Buddy Guy to really get going on his recording career, but once he did, he really turned it into something. Sweet Tea is the masterpiece in this run of albums, but they’re all really excellent and represent a period of experimentation that encompassed acoustic blues, deep southern electric blues, and modern R&B. He’s fallen off in recent years, but I’ll always have these albums.

5. The Allman Brothers (The Allman Brothers Band, Idlewild South, Live at the Fillmore East, Eat a Peach, Brothers and Sisters) – I’m giving five albums here because it feels ridiculous to leave the Filmore off, but the original rules require studio albums. Rather sadly, the Allman brothers haven’t done much else for a very long time.

Some things are easy to forget. James turned one a little more than a month ago. Up until then, he had been a baby in all the ways you and I normally think of babies. But he is suddenly not a baby any more. He walks. He talks (a little). He plays with his sister. He grabs things off tables. He is now a toddler.

Toddlers are adorable, but they are high maintenance. Simone, of course, went through this stage, but I had forgotten how you suddenly can’t sit things on tables and how quickly bumps and bruises mount.

And the teething. Oh, the teething.

But it’s really neat, too. Toddlers are more aggravating than babies, but they are also more interesting. James is really starting to have his own personality now. His default expression is one of unsuppressed joy and I can’t blame him if, on occasion, that joy gets derailed by bone cutting its way through his gums.

But maybe the neatest recent development is the way Simone and James suddenly play together, often for a long time. Simone things up all manner of elaborate games and James has no idea what’s going on, but his thrilled to have his sister’s attention. A time will come (and indeed it has already, at times) when they will bicker and fight and annoy the hell out of each other, but what’s happening right now sure is nice.

I planned/still plan to get myself on a regular writing schedule now that various work things have been put to bed. I have lots of ideas. But the thing about having kids is things don’t really go according to plan. Simone got sick and James cut a tooth and then I caught Simone’s cold and all of sudden it’s Saturday and I’ve done very little blogging/writing this week.

Oh well. There’s always next week, and sometimes you just have to wait for it.

As is, I think, pretty widely known now, I write for a couple of baseball sites. Recently, I had an article up on one of them that some people took issue with. I got into a bit of a pissing contest in the comments when I probably should have let it lie. But the discussion raised an interesting issue. The discussion, went basically like this:

Commenter: I don’t know what the point of this is.

Me: I think it’s pretty clear. You should read the article.

Other Commenter: If someone misunderstands, it is always the writer’s fault. You should try to improve.

Fortunately, I more or less stopped responding after that last sentiment was expressed as I was just about to lose my cool entirely. Still, that last idea is, I think, completely absurd. Let me tell you why.

The assumption that the writer is always responsible for any misunderstanding (and this is a sentiment I have heard expressed many times) is flawed for a number of reasons.

1. It presumes that all (adults/near adults) have more or less the same level of literacy. This is simply not true. I saw recently that only 12 percent of the population actually ends up fully literate. That is, only 12 percent of America is capable of fully understanding the depth and nuance of sophisticated literature. If you doubt this, go to Amazon and look at the one star reviews of any classic. Here, let’s try. How about Anna Karenina?

Hmmm…what to say indeed. Well, this could be an OK story if, you know, it was a short story. Basically not much happens and a lot of the story describes the land and how Levin is so wonderful and devoted to his wife. Some whould say that this is superb literary thechnique, I say that if you are publishing a novel, let it have a story line. Anna’s hardly even in the story anyway. Most would argue that Levin (the goodie two shoes) is the protagonist because he represents Tolstoy’s view of Russia.

Now, I suppose it is possible for a well read and educated person to dislike this novel. There are, I am sure, some negative critical takes. This person, however, clearly doesn’t understand the point of the book at all. And I don’t think we can put that on Tolstoy.

I am not, of course, saying that baseball articles should be written only for the 12 percent of people who can read and fully understand a complex novel like Anna Karenina. Nor am I comparing a baseball article to Anna Karenina. Rather, I am pointing out that the reader has an obligation to fully engage with the text, and that often, failure to understand is a failure of the consumer of the text rather than the producer. Reading is not a passive activity and if someone is trying to make it into one, they misunderstand the process.

Often books and articles are poorly written. But unless you, as a reader, are willing to fully engage with the text, you are not qualified to make that judgment. Writers have an obligation to present the text in the best way they can with a level of complexity that is appropriate to the intended audience. They do not have an obligation to over-simplify so that the least engaged reader can fully understand. That would make for a lot of boring writing.

Here We Go Again

If you’ve been paying attention at all, you know I’ve been doing this certification thing for a while and that it’s finally winding down. The certification requires a lot of writing. A lot. And then a lot rewriting. It means I haven’t been doing much fiction writing for this last year and so ideas have been building up in my head.

Over the last couple of weeks, I’ve started two novels and I’m still working on this short story collection.

Whoops.

I didn’t really mean to suddenly become so ambitious, but I’ve never really been able to control these things. It is interesting to see how each new thing I write is the sum of what has come before it. For a long time, I wrote only in third person, but I’ve been really trying hard to improve my first person writing with short stories and suddenly, both of the new things are proving to be a marriage of first and third person with a variety of different voices and perspectives.

I’d also forgotten how nice it feels to start writing something long. I’ve been heavily focused on short stories for several years and while I like writing them, there isn’t really a great deal of opportunity to engage in complex subplots and intricate character development. It’s nice to have the space to do those things. It means I can spend a couple of pages describing the mood of a county fair.

What, you may ask, are these things about? I’m not sure, exactly. One is a baseball novel, and I think it will be fairly short (it feels like about 200 pages, but I could be wrong). Given my presence in the online baseball community, I’m hoping to have a reasonably decent time finding an agent or publisher for it. Failing that, I may well self-publish this one.

The other one is more complex and will involve longer stretches of time and lots of jumping around in time and place. I have ideas, but I’m mostly letting this one do what it wants to do.

I am, interestingly for me, taking notes on both of these. I’ve never done that before. I always prefer to just sit down, start writing, and see where it goes. But kids/work/remaining certification stuff/blogging obligations mean I don’t always get a chance to sit down and write seriously when I want to. And, as much as I am a believer that inspiration is not a necessary part of good writing, I do require a reasonable isolation to write fiction. I don’t need that for blogging, which is why you’re getting this post now.

While I don’t want to be overly ambitious, I’d like to see about finishing a draft the baseball book by the end of the summer. It probably won’t happen, but 60,000 words really isn’t that much (I’d probably only need 400 or so a day if I started right now), and I am usually a pretty quick writer.

This all means that you’ll probably be seeing a lot more writing stuff on here for a while. Lately, the blog has been very family and teaching focused. Those post will still be here, but I do like writing about writing, so prepare yourselves.

Accidents

I certainly have not been a prolific blogger lately. That isn’t intentional, but it is what it is. So, by way of actually posting something, I offer the assorted hodgepodge of things:

1. While I am very excited for the coming summer, I am very proud of the teaching job I’ve done this year. Obviously, I won’t know how my AP kids do on the test until much later, but the number of kids I have who intend to take the test represent a big leap forward for my school, and I think they will all, at least, feel prepared for college, which is what my real goal has always been.

2. Along those lines, I’m kind of amazed at the relationships I’ve formed with some of my students this year. I suppose this is what happens when the right teacher ends up with the right students.

3. It is possible that I will have what is for me a very, very big change to report on sometime in the next few months. I cannot say anything at all publicly right now, but it’s pretty exciting for me.

4. Speaking of exciting (or perhaps terrifying). I think I accidentally started a new novel this weekend. I seem to be putting the cart before the horse here as I have two novels on my hard drive that haven’t been published and a collection of short stories/vaguely novelish think that needs to be finished. But here we go. I let Cate read the first few pages and she wondered aloud why she even bothers trying to write. I’m pretty sure this was a compliment, so I’ll keep at it. I think I know what I’m doing this summer.

5. We have several friends coming by in the next few weeks, and I’m pretty excited. Cate’s best friend will be coming in this weekend and then a very good friend of mine (who I haven’t seen for several years) will be in during my spring break. Fun times.

I’m sure I’ll have some kind of deep/thoughtful post before too long, but I wanted to get something up in the meantime. I’m trying to become regular about this stuff again. We’ll see how that goes.

Future Self

I have given the better part of a year to some future ideal. Wait, no. That isn’t right. I have given the better part of a year to raising the floor so that if some future ideal fails to materialize, what remains will be softer. Will cushion the fall better. I have been working. And in that time my son has turned one and he splashes at the side of the tub while my bathing daughter, soon to be four, laughs and splashes at him.

I have come, in this last year, to understand something about what it meant for my own parents to raise me. For my father – so often exhausted from weeks of 12 hour days. One weekend off a month. For my mother – also working, but home in the nights. Putting me to bed after dad left on the night shift.

An ache develops when you subsume yourself to work. I want to believe that I did enough. That I have secured my children’s love in the way my father secured my love when we played catch in the twilight just after he’d woken and just before he drug himself back out to work among smoldering metal until after the sun came up again. I saw only my father playing with me, and I hope that my children saw the same thing, but I doubt. He must have doubted, too. Parenting is a lot about doubting.

As I have felt the ache grow, it has grown for my children and for my wife who has shoulder the extra load when I have been away. It has also grown for me because I have gotten so far away from the things that make me feel tethered to the world. I have been lost and floating in an educational vacuum that allowed little else into its perimeters. And I am tired.

But lately, I have been writing. There are a few pages open even now. The file given the name of a character until I know what the story will be called. My fingers have callouses again, though they are thin, and there is a new guitar in our closet.

It is easier to toss my children up in the air. It is easier to look out of the fog of work and remember what I have in a wife. The floor is higher and it is easier to remember.

Why I Write (or Have Written)

Every time I start a writing class, I ask them to compose a “Why I Write” essay. I was given the assignment in a writing class once upon a time, and I think it is a good one. Periodically, I take a new crack at it. I have never been happy with the results. They always seem overly-pretentious, heavily clichéd, and more than a little dishonest. What follows is my attempt to rectify past inadequacies.

I came to writing late. Much later than anyone else I know who writes seriously. I never voluntarily wrote anything creative until college. I spent too long wrapped in the idea that knowledge was finite. That the primary goal of all society should be to learn as much as possible about what was already there. I did not, for whatever reason, think that creating something new and relevant was possible. I mean that literally. I could not fathom new creation.

Then, when I was a senior in high school, two very important things happened. One, I started to play the guitar. Two, I fell – quite hard – for a girl who was dating a friend of mine.

I was quick, as so many have been, to make the connection between music and romance, and this is what prompt my first real efforts at writing. I would write songs, I decided. She would hear them and, obviously, want to be with me.

It didn’t work out that way, of course. A year or so after I started my creative endeavors, we had a falling out and didn’t speak for two years. I kept writing songs. Mostly about her. Some of them were decent. Some of them weren’t.

In the interim, I took a fiction writing class because I thought it would be easy. I engaged in the typical copying of stuff I liked. None of it was any good. Much of it was – yes, still – about that girl.

I wish I could paint a more interesting picture. Along the way, I did begin to write some things that, even today, I am not actively ashamed of. Many, many of them involved a lonely narrator who had lost a girl. It was a theme. But I also started to hear other stories in my head and I came across the answer I always give now when someone asks why I write. It is not an entirely honest answer, but I say that I write because there are these stories in my head and if I don’t write them no one else will. It is true. That is why I write. But that is not all.

Eventually, the girl and I reconnected. We even dated for a while in a fiery, disastrous kind of way that ended with me living back where I grew up, alone and terribly depressed for reasons that go beyond being left and come from watching cruelty too often practiced on those we care for.

I started writing a novel. It was an accident. It was about a jazz piano player who falls for a singer. They have a tempestuous on and off thing and end up together. It was okay. I might go back to it someday. But, just to be clear. I was a blues guitarist and the girl was a singer and I had not yet given up hope of us getting together. I see now how terribly wrong the ending of that first book was.

It took a few years where I didn’t do much beyond work my dead-end job, write sometimes, and play guitar, but I did come out of it. There was a new story and though loss of a woman was part of it, that wasn’t the whole. There was more. I started to dance around in it. I was still writing for an audience, but I was less sure now of who that audience was. And, in truth, it was probably a version of me. I think I often wrote to not feel lonely, but there was something else. The nagging voice that wouldn’t let me go. And vague hopes of recognition, even fame, because I thought this was really, maybe turning into something.

And then I met Cate and it happened that she was a writer, too. A really good writer. She tore apart the first thing I showed her, but she liked it and she asked to see more and I showed it to her and she liked that and then, well, it went from there.

And it strikes me now, how terribly wrong the first girl was for me. How it never would have worked even though there are parallels between that relationship and my marriage. Between her experiences and Cate’s. Everything was off, just a touch, in way that made life disorienting and disturbing like a piano with one key out of tune.

I thought I was writing for this first girl, but really, I was writing for who I wanted her to be. I was writing for Cate. I didn’t know it, but even now, I can see how those first clumsy stories might have appealled to Cate. How they are often not so dissimilar in execution from other things she loved.

And in that time I spent waiting, I learned a great deal. I learned to be honest in my writing and to not do disservice to my characters by writing wrong endings for them because the real endings, the ones that should be written, weren’t what I wanted them to be. I learned to stop trying to say something and to just write instead. The saying something would work itself out.

Still today, when I sit down to write – something work and children keep from happening enough – I write because of the little pinprick voices whispering stories at my internal ear. But I write also for Cate because she has always had the standards I want in a reader. When I suspect that she will not like it, I am really suspecting that I have not been honest – even if that honesty requires something I do not want to give.

And so, I write to give voice to the stories. And I write in hopes that other will want to hear those same voices. And I write especially for that one other who frowns when some is wrong and who smiles when I’ve gotten it just as it should be.